10 Best Lovable.dev Alternatives Worth Considering in 2025

Most people start with Lovable because it’s quick for app prototypes, but switch to other tools when they need more control over the app architecture or enterprise-level features. 

‍

Our top Lovable.dev alternatives are Superblocks for enterprise-grade internal tools, Cursor for in-IDE AI assistance, and Bubble if you prefer a purely no-code solution.

‍

In this article, we’ll cover:

• Top 10 Lovable alternatives
• The key features and pricing for each
• How to choose the right alternative for your task

10 best Lovable.dev alternatives: TL;DR

If you don’t have time to read the deep dive, here’s the quick rundown. I pulled together what each tool is best for, its pricing, and the key strength that makes it worth considering:

1. Superblocks

What it does: Superblocks is an AI internal app development platform that helps enterprises solve shadow IT and engineering bottlenecks with a secure, governed platform.

‍

Who it’s for: Operationally heavy enterprises that want to democratize development across business and engineering teams without compromising on security or governance.

Key features

• Three development modalities: Superblocks has an AI agent for generating apps from prompts. You can refine these apps in the WYSIWYG drag-and-drop editor or directly edit the code in your preferred IDE.
• Centrally managed governance layer: It features RBAC, SSO, granular controls, and audit logs, all managed from a single administrative panel. You can also integrate with secret managers for secure credentials management.
• AI app generation with AI guardrails: Superblocks supports custom prompting and extensive prompt customization. You can set custom rules for prompt sanitization and code validation.
• Use extensive integrations: It integrates with any API or database (e.g., REST, gRPC, GraphQL, OpenAPI). You can also connect to your existing software development life cycles, including Git-based systems (GitHub, GitLab) and CI/CD pipelines.
• Forward-deployed engineers: The dedicated field engineering team provides hands-on support to help you get up and running quickly.

Pros

• Technical and semi-technical builders can create internal apps on the platform.
• Centralized control and visibility reduce shadow IT/AI.
• AI guardrails enable enterprise-grade vibe coding.
• You can easily integrate with your existing stack and DevOps pipelines for collaboration within engineering teams.

Cons

• Superblocks doesn’t offer a fully on-prem deployment option yet.
• It doesn't support native mobile internal apps.

Pricing

Superblocks uses custom pricing that’s based on the number of creators, end users, and your deployment model (fully on the cloud or VPC deployment).

Bottom line

Use Superblocks if you are building enterprise internal apps and need governance and security controls.

2. Retool

What it does: Retool is a popular platform that has been in the internal tool development space for years. It’s primarily focused on building internal apps but also supports external and mobile apps. Retool offers an extensive library of templates, components, and integrations that speed up the app-building process.

‍

Who it’s for: Organizations that need a builder that can support multiple types of apps, including native mobile and external-facing apps.

Key features

• Visual app builder: Retool provides a library of pre-built components, such as tables, text inputs, buttons, and charts, that you drag onto a canvas to build layouts.
• Custom code: It supports JavaScript, SQL queries, and custom React components.
• AI functionality: Retool has AI features that you can use to connect to external models and build agentic workflows and intelligent tools.
• Enterprise security features: It offers SSO, audit logging, RBAC, version control, and supports self-hosting.

Pros

• Retool has a vast component library that covers most needs (e.g., tables with pagination, forms with validation).
• It has out-of-the-box connectors to 70+ integrations that save you from configuring integrations.
• It supports internal tools, external apps, workflow automations, and mobile interfaces.
• Retool has user management and RBAC for controlling access to the tools you build.

Cons

• Self-hosting the app adds management and infrastructure overhead, which increases the total cost of ownership.
• You can’t export your Retool apps as standard code. They only run on the Retool platform.

Read more about the pros and cons of Retool in our review.

Pricing

Retool has a free plan for up to 5 users and 500 database/API queries per month. Paid plans start at $12 /developer per month and $7/internal end-user/month.

Bottom line

Retool is a tried-and-true choice for rapidly building internal tools. Use it if you want a self-hosted internal tool builder with a mobile app building option.

3. Cursor

What it does: Cursor is not an app builder like Lovable.dev, but rather an AI-powered code editor that helps you write code faster in the IDE. It predicts the next line of code, answers questions about your codebase, and helps you fix bugs.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers who prefer writing code but want AI assistance. It’s also useful for those working with large codebases and need help understanding or modifying existing code.

Key features

• AI code generation & editing: Cursor applies the changes you describe directly in your code.
• Codebase-aware chat: Cursor indexes your entire project. You can ask questions about your codebase in plain English.
• Multiple AI models: Cursor lets you choose or combine models like GPT, Claude, etc., depending on the task. The “Auto” mode picks the best suited for the context.
• Agent mode: This mode autonomously completes tasks end-to-end.

Pros

• It speeds up the coding process with tab completion and multi-line edits.
• Cursor understands your codebase and provides relevant edits and answers.
• The privacy mode keeps models from storing your data or training on it.
• It supports your VS Code extensions, themes, and keybindings.

Cons

• Cursor can sometimes produce code that doesn’t compile or isn’t optimal.
• You need to know how to code.

Pricing

The free plan gives you a 2-week Pro trial and a limited number of AI completions. The individual plans start at $20/month, while team plans start at $40/user/month.

Bottom line

Cursor is ideal for any developer who wants to keep full control over their app’s stack and architecture but supercharge their productivity with AI.

4. Bolt.new

What it does: Bolt.new (often called Bolt) is an AI web app builder developed by the StackBlitz team. It lets you create full-stack applications by chatting with an AI. It’s most similar to Lovable, but using Bolt feels closer to a traditional coding environment.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers who want to quickly prototype web and mobile apps with AI.

Key features

• Natural language to full-stack code: Bolt can generate frontend, backend, and database integrations from a single prompt.
• Built-in code editor: It has a live code editor for inspecting and tweaking the code.
• Instant preview and run: The one-click “Run” button launches the app live in the browser so you can test it immediately.
• Easy deployment: It integrates with Netlify for direct deployments.
• Mobile support: Bolt supports mobile app development via the Expo integration.

Pros

• It generates frontend and backend applications.
• It supports mobile app development via the Expo integration.
•  Bolt allows you to continue editing the code directly once it generates the app.

Cons

• Bolt's token-based pricing system is difficult to understand, and tokens get used far too fast.
• You need to know how to code to iterate on your app.

Pricing

Bolt.new is free to try with a token-based free tier that gives you 150k tokens per day. Paid plans start at $25/month, billed monthly for 10M tokens.

Bottom line

Bolt is one of the closest tools to Lovable.dev in concept because it's a conversation AI builder for external apps. Consider it if you’re comfortable using code to iterate on your apps or are building React native mobile apps.

5. UI Bakery

What it does: UI Bakery is a low-code platform for building internal tools like admin panels and dashboards. It has recently added an AI app generator and assistant to speed up development.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers or tech-savvy business users who want to build production internal apps quickly with low-code and AI support.

Key features

• Drag-and-drop UI builder: UI Bakery comes with 80+ pre-built components that you can visually arrange to create a responsive layout.
• AI app generator: The AI playground generates web apps on top of your data from prompts. You can then iterate using prompts or the low-code editor.
• AI assistant chatbot: Within the builder, there’s an AI assistant (GPT-4 powered) you can consult for help.
• Data source integration: You can connect to your data sources or use the UI Bakery Postgres database.

Pros

• You get an AI generation and a low-code editor with some code support.
• You can apply your own theme or use built-in UI bakery themes
• UI Bakery supports Git-based version control.
• You can run UI Bakery in your own cloud or servers so that none of your data leaves your environment.

Cons

• It doesn’t give you access to your app’s code.
• It’s optimized only for internal tool development.

Pricing

UI Bakery offers a free plan with unlimited apps, pages, actions, and data sources for up to 5 users. Paid pricing is the same for cloud and on-prem deployments, starting at $6 per user/month and $12 per developer/month.

Bottom line

UI Bakery is a strong option for enterprises that want a self-hosted low-code builder with AI generation to speed up internal tool development.

6. GitHub 

What it does: GitHub’s Spark feature generates full-stack apps from natural language descriptions and deploys them within the GitHub ecosystem.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers who already use Copilot in their daily coding and want to build prototypes.

Key features

• Natural language app specification: Spark generates code from a text prompt describing the app’s requirements.
• GitHub Codespaces integration: It opens the app directly in GitHub Codespaces, where Copilot Chat is available for refinements.
• Iterative prompting and editing: Spark lets you add features or make changes by prompting again or editing code manually in Codespaces.
• Built-in auth and AI services: Spark apps include GitHub authentication by default and can use Copilot’s AI model for features like text generation.

Pros

• Spark handles the entire development cycle from creating the code to hosting it.
• It's free to use if you already have a Copilot Pro+ subscription.
• Spark provides built-in authentication and database setup out of the box.

Cons

• Spark locks you into GitHub’s ecosystem for hosting and authentication.
• It is in public preview.
• It’s not suitable for large-scale production deployments.

Pricing

GitHub Spark is available to anyone with GitHub Copilot Pro+ at $39/user/month.

Bottom line

GitHub makes sense if you already have Copilot and want a simple way to generate prototypes. Just keep in mind it’s still in preview.

7. Firebase Studio

What it does: Firebase Studio is Google’s AI-powered app development environment for building backends, frontends, and mobile apps.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers who want to use Gemini to quickly prototype apps and don’t mind staying inside the Firebase and Google Cloud ecosystem.

Key features

• App prototyping agent: It uses Gemini to prototype full-stack apps from prompts, images, and drawings.
• Code editing support: The IDE, based on Code OSS, lets you inspect code, add logic, or integrate additional libraries.
• Firebase integration: It integrates with Firebase services for database, hosting, or authentication.
• Built-in emulators: Firebase Studio includes runtime tools for emulating, testing, and debugging. You can also preview web and Android apps in the browser.

Pros

• The look and feel of the IDE are almost identical to VS Code, since the editor experience, shortcuts, and UI come from Code OSS.
• You can import projects from existing projects or start from scratch.
• It supports multiple programming languages and frameworks, including JavaScript, Python, Go, and .NET.

Cons

• It's still in preview.
• The prototypes are structured around Firebase services, which may be limiting.

Pricing

Firebase Studio is currently free. If you connect to Firebase resources, you’ll incur costs for usage.

Bottom line

Firebase Studio feels more developer-oriented than Lovable.dev. It offers a complete IDE for writing and editing code, but ties you closely to the Firebase ecosystem.

8. Glide

What it does: Glide is a no-code platform that turns spreadsheets into web or mobile apps. It generates an initial app interface from your data, which you then refine with a drag-and-drop builder.

‍

Who it’s for: Non-developers and organizations that rely heavily on spreadsheets for business processes.

Key features

• Data-driven app builder: Glide connects to Google Sheets, Excel, CSVs, or Glide Tables and auto-generates an app UI.
• Drag-and-drop interface design: The drag-and-drop builder lets you add components such as text, images, maps, and buttons, and bind them to data in your sheets.
• Glide AI columns: Glide provides AI-powered columns for tasks like text summarization or transcription.
• Actionable components and workflows: It lets you assign actions to buttons or forms, including sending emails, updating data, or calling webhooks.

Pros

• Glide makes app development accessible to non-technical users.
• Glide apps are progressive web apps by default.
• You can compile Glide apps to native mobile apps.

Cons

• It’s not suitable for custom UI that’s off-template or needs heavy custom logic.
• Glide AI features are not as flexible as coding with an AI API directly. They’re essentially one-click implementations of common AI tasks.

Pricing

Glide has a free tier that supports 1 app, 10 personal users, no updates, and up to 25K rows. Paid plans start at $25 per month, billed annually for one app, 100 personal users, and 250 data updates.

Bottom line

Glide is a strong fit if your goal is to turn spreadsheet workflows into polished apps with minimal setup. It lowers the barrier for non-technical users, but advanced customization still requires other tools.

9. Bubble

What it does: Bubble lets you build apps by dragging and dropping UI components on a canvas and defining workflows visually. Recently, it introduced an AI App Generator (still in beta) that can scaffold an app based on natural language prompts.

‍

Who it’s for: Entrepreneurs, startups, and makers who want to launch web apps without code. Some enterprises also use Bubble for MVPs or small internal projects.

Key features

• Visual design editor: Bubble’s editor provides elements such as buttons, text, input fields, and repeating lists for building pages.
• Database and data editor: Bubble includes a database that you configure visually. You can create, read, update, and delete entries via workflows or through an auto-generated admin interface.
• Workflow logic engine: Bubble’s workflow tool supports trigger-action sequences such as “When Save is clicked → create Order → go to confirmation page.”
• Plugin ecosystem: It has a marketplace with plugins for adding functionality using UI elements, integrations, actions, and more.

Pros

• AI app iteration is accessible for non-technical users. They edit their apps visually and not in code.
• It supports iOS and Android apps, though this feature is still in beta.
• Bubble has a large community, extensive tutorials, and an active plugin ecosystem.

Cons

• Bubble has a steep learning curve, despite being no-code. You may need to hire Bubble developers.
• Bubble’s AI generator does not support third-party APIs and produces generic UIs.
• It doesn’t allow code export since the runtime is proprietary.

Pricing

Bubble offers a free development tier on a bubble.io subdomain. Paid plans start at $32/month billed annually, and support live apps on custom domains. The Team plan costs $399/month. Mobile plans start at $49 per month.

Bottom line

Bubble remains a top contender for building web apps without code. The AI generator helps with early builds, but you’ll still need to learn how Bubble’s environment works to achieve production-ready results.

10. Replit

What it does: Replit is an online IDE that now includes an AI agent to help build and modify apps. Unlike Lovable.dev, it supports more programming languages beyond JavaScript frameworks.

‍

Who it’s for: Developers, learners, and prototypers who want an AI to handle repetitive coding tasks but still want full control over the codebase.

Key features

• AI agent: Replit’s agent creates multi-file projects and makes iterative improvements through a chat interface.
• Plan and build modes: Plan Mode lets you brainstorm ideas with the AI before it writes code. Build Mode executes those plans and modifies the codebase.
• Collaboration: Teams can invite others to edit projects within the same environment.
• Local IDE integration: Replit can connect to your local IDE, such as VS Code, using SSH.

Pros

• Replit lets you open any of the generated files, review the code, and edit it yourself.
• You can review and modify the plan or approve it before the agent writes code.
• It supports multiple programming languages.
• Local IDE integration enables traditional workflows while keeping apps synced with Replit.

Cons

• It's not suited for production-grade applications.
• Replit does not include a drag-and-drop builder, though you can reference UI elements in chat.

Pricing

Replit offers a free plan with up to 10 development apps and a trial of the AI agent. Paid plans start at $25/month (billed annually) and include access to the AI agent, $25 in monthly credits, and unlimited public and private apps.

Bottom line

Replit is best for hobbyists, students, solopreneurs, and small teams prototyping new ideas. Even companies like Zillow use it for product management prototypes, but it’s not built for enterprise-grade production apps.

How I tested these alternatives

I tested each tool by building a simple app and focusing on the factors that matter most to developers and technical team leads, considering a move away from Lovable.dev.

‍

I focused on a few core criteria:

• Speed of development: How quickly can you go from idea to a working app or prototype? This matters because Lovable’s biggest draw is rapid prototyping.
• Ease of use vs. learning curve: I paid attention to how intuitive the tool is, especially for someone coming from Lovable.dev. Ease of adoption is critical for team-wide use.
• Iterative options: I tested how much you can improve the generated app just by prompting before you need to use a visual editor or code.

My process: I split testing into two parts. First, I used each tool’s AI feature or editor to build a simple app to gauge the initial friction and time-to-first-result. Then, I evaluated how easy it was to customize and grow that app afterward. I also consulted official docs and user community forums for insights into real-world usage.

Which alternative should you choose?

Use Bolt, Replit, Spark, or Firebase Studio to prototype external-facing apps from prompts. Bubble, if you want a completely no-code option. Superblocks, Retool, or UI Bakery for internal tools, and Cursor if you need AI assistance as you write code.

‍

My personal recommendation:

• Choose Superblocks if you want to empower business and engineering teams to build internal apps with AI without introducing shadow AI or compromising your enterprise standards.
• Choose Retool or UI Bakery if you need a fully on-prem solution and can handle the costs and overhead of self-hosting.
• Choose Glide if your data lives in spreadsheets and you need an app layer to interact with that data.
• Choose Bolt, Firebase Studio, Replit, or GitHub Spark if you want a tool closest to Lovable.dev for prompt-to-app generation. Bolt and Firebase Studio include mobile support and feel more code-forward after generation. Spark integrates neatly if you already pay for GitHub Copilot.
• Choose Bubble if you want a no-code option with a visual builder and don’t mind its learning curve.
• Stick with Lovable if you need quick prototypes or proofs-of-concept, and you’re satisfied with the scope of what Lovable.dev can build.

Our final verdict: Use Superblocks for secure, governed internal tools

Among the tools we’ve discussed, Superblocks is the most enterprise-ready for internal tools. It gives you the flexibility of AI-powered app generation with the governance, security, and extensibility that large organizations need.

‍

We’ve looked at the features that enable this, but just to recap:

• Flexible development modalities: Teams can use Clark to generate apps from prompts, the WYSIWYG drag-and-drop editor, or code. Superblocks syncs the changes you make in code and the visual editor.
• AI guardrails: Every app built with Clark abides by organizational standards for data security, permissions, and compliance. This addresses the major LLM risks of ungoverned shadow AI app generation.
• Centrally managed governance layer: It supports granular access controls with RBAC, SSO, and audit logs, all centrally governed from a single pane of glass across all users. It also integrates with secret managers for safe credentials management.
• Keep data on prem: It has an on-prem agent you can deploy within your VPC to keep sensitive data in-network.
• Extensive integrations: It can integrate with any API or databases. These integrations include your SDLC processes, like Git workflows and CI/CD pipelines.

Ready for fast, secure internal tool generation? Book a demo with one of our product experts.

Frequently asked questions

What is Lovable.dev known for?

Lovable is well known for generating full-stack web apps from plain English descriptions. It makes app creation feel as simple as writing a user story.

Can I use Lovable.dev for free?

You can use Lovable for free via the free plan, which gives you 5 daily credits (up to 30 per month). Once you exhaust that, you’ll need a paid plan or wait for the next month when your credits reset.

What is the best Lovable.dev alternative in 2025?

Superblocks is the best Lovable alternative for enterprise readiness and overall capability because it generates apps from prompts without trading security or governance. That said, if you’re a startup or individual building prototypes, consider Bolt.new, Replit, or Firebase Studio.

Are there free alternatives to Lovable.dev?

Yes, Firebase Studio is currently a free preview (subject to change). Some open-source options like ToolJet also offer free community editions.

What are the best open-source alternatives to Lovable.dev?

ToolJet and Appsmith are established open-source alternatives to Lovable.dev for internal tool building. Zed is an open-source code editor with AI features, similar to Cursor.

How does Superblocks compare to Lovable.dev?

Superblocks offers enterprise-level security and governance for production-grade internal apps, while Lovable.dev focuses on quick customer-facing prototypes without built-in governance.