7 Best AI Code Governance Tools for Enterprises in 2025

If you’re looking for an AI code governance tool for your internal apps, go with Superblocks. It’ll help you standardize development in one secure environment. 

‍

Endor Labs is great if your biggest worry is open source security, and Domo works well if you need to secure the data that feeds your AI systems. 

‍

Each of these tools will help you scale AI development safely.

‍

This article covers:

• What AI governance is and why it's essential
• The top 7 AI governance platforms and their key features
• How to choose the right solution for your organization's scale and risk requirements

What is AI code governance?

AI code governance refers to the policies, processes, and tools that organizations use to manage AI systems throughout their lifecycle. This includes monitoring model behavior, ensuring compliance with regulations, tracking data lineage, and maintaining audit trails for AI-generated code and decisions.

‍

You’ll commonly see it used alongside code and model governance:

• Code governance: Focuses on the development, review, and deployment of AI-powered applications and generated code
• Model governance: Manages machine learning models themselves, including training data, performance metrics, and model versioning

AI governance encompasses the broader organizational framework for responsible AI use, including ethics, risk management, and strategic oversight.

Why can't you just use traditional IT governance? 

You can’t just use traditional IT governance for AI systems because these systems evolve their behavior over time, make autonomous decisions, and operate with limited explainability. Standard code review processes don't capture these risks. Traditional change management also doesn't account for models that learn and adapt over time.

Why governance tools are essential in the age of AI

Governance tools are essential because they help scale AI safely across an enterprise. AI systems without proper oversight can:

• Introduce bias into business decisions
• Generate hallucinated information that appears credible
• Fail to meet regulatory compliance requirements 

When these failures happen, organizations face legal liability, damaged customer relationships, and costly operational disruptions.

‍

But the push for AI governance isn't just about avoiding disasters. 

‍

Organizations are discovering that governance provides the visibility and control mechanisms to build stakeholder trust in AI. They also help control the spiraling costs associated with unmanaged AI development and deployment.

7 best AI code governance tools: TL;DR

After evaluating tools across governance depth, enterprise readiness, and integration capabilities, these seven platforms stand out from the competition.

‍

Here's how they compare side by side:

1. Superblocks

Superblocks is an AI internal app generation platform that enables responsible democratization of AI app development  with a secure, centrally governed platform. This helps operationally complex enterprises solve shadow IT and engineering bottlenecks.

Key features

• Three development modalities: Superblocks supports AI app generation, visual editing with the WYSIWYG drag-and-drop editors, or direct code in your preferred IDE with live two-way sync.
• Centralized governance: It offers enterprise-grade RBAC, SSO, and audit logs. You can also integrate with secret managers for secure credentials management.
• Clark AI with enterprise guardrails: The AI agent generates internal apps using natural language while enforcing organizational security policies, coding best practices, and design standards.
• Extensive integrations: The platform connects to virtually any API or database. You can also integrate with SDLC processes such as Git workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
• Hybrid deployment: The on-premises agent keeps sensitive data in your network, but you can still manage apps and users on Superblocks Cloud.

Pros

• Complete AI governance from code generation to production monitoring.
• Enterprise-grade security built in from day one.
• No vendor lock-in with open, extensible React backend
• Forward-deployed engineers provide hands-on implementation support.
• Works with your existing tech stack and development workflow.

Cons

• Focused on application-level governance rather than model performance monitoring.
• No fully on-prem option yet.

Pricing

Superblocks uses custom pricing based on the number of builders, end users, and deployment model. Contact sales for a tailored quote or book a demo.

Bottom line

Superblocks excels at enabling fully-governed AI-generated applications and internal tools for the enterprise. It's the best choice for enterprises dealing with shadow IT, engineering bottlenecks, or the need to scale AI development safely across multiple teams.

2. Endor Labs

Endor Labs specializes in software supply chain security for AI-generated code. The platform identifies vulnerabilities in open source dependencies and AI model outputs.

Key features

• AI model and code analysis: Endor Labs identifies risks in AI models, tracks AI model provenance, and enforces governance for AI-generated code.
• Reachability analysis: It uses program analysis to identify which vulnerabilities actually pose a risk to applications.
• Endor Patches: The Patches plan allows you to backport security fixes to current versions without breaking changes for faster remediation.
• Policy engine: The platform supports API-first governance with precise policies tailored to your risks and workflows.
• IDE integrations: It has native integration with AI coding assistants like Cursor, GitHub Copilot, and Windsurf.

Pros

• It reduces security alert noise with precise vulnerability detection.
• It helps accelerate remediation with upgrade impact analysis.
• You can integrate it with developer workflows.

Cons

• Endor Labs is primarily focused on code security rather than broader AI governance.
• It may require additional tools for comprehensive AI governance.

Pricing

Endor Labs offers 3 pricing tiers. The Core plan identifies up to 10 top OSS risks, the Pro fixes OSS vulnerabilities, while the Patches plan patches vulnerabilities without installing other dependencies. All the plans are custom.

Bottom line

Choose Endor Labs if your primary concern is securing AI-generated code and open source dependencies.

3. Domo

Domo provides data governance with AI-powered features for organizations that need to govern both their data and AI models. The platform emphasizes data safety and responsible AI implementation.

Key features

• Governance toolkit: This toolkit automates compliance, auditing, report scheduling, permission management, and dataset tagging for improved reporting.
• Access controls and security: Domo supports RBAC, SSO, and customer-managed encryption keys for cloud data. 
• DomoGPT: It has private AI models that work within your data environment without external data sharing.
• Data lineage and auditability: It tracks data usage from ingestion through transformation and logs user actions, changes, and system activity for compliance.

Pros

• Governance features ensure enterprise-grade security and regulatory confidence.
• It has tools for building custom, branded dashboards, apps, and embedded analytics into other services.
• It has over 1000 pre-built connections that simplify data aggregation from multiple sources.

Cons

• Large datasets or very complex dashboards may experience slow loading, according to user reviews.
• The built-in dashboards and reports have limited customization options.
• Some users report slow or inconsistent customer service.

Pricing

Domo uses consumption-based pricing, so you pay for what you use. It’s free for 30 days, but you’ll have to talk to sales after that to get on a paid plan.

Bottom line

Domo works best for data-driven organizations that need governance across both traditional data and AI workloads, particularly in regulated industries.

4. Knostic

Knostic provides need-to-know access controls for large language models. It helps prevent LLM-based enterprise applications like Microsoft 365 Copilot and Glean from oversharing sensitive information.

Key features

• Need-to-know access controls: Knostic has dynamic, context-aware data sharing controls for AI-generated insights.
• Automated oversharing detection: It simulates realistic user prompts and scenarios to proactively identify hidden risk pathways where AI systems could infer and expose confidential information.
• Dynamic response shaping: Knostic can provide non-sensitive alternative AI responses that preserve business workflows instead of denying requests.
• Audit trails: It generates detailed audit logs of AI interactions, supporting compliance with major frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, and FINRA.

Pros

• Knostic maintains business workflow by providing safe, alternate answers when blocking sensitive information.
• It catches hidden LLM risks that static security controls can't detect when AI models connect disparate data points.
• The platform dynamically evaluates each request rather than relying on pre-set access lists that quickly become outdated.

Cons

• Setup and policy tuning require knowledge of organizational roles and business logic.
• It only has native support for Microsoft 365, Glean, and Gemini.

Pricing

Knostic pricing is not available on their website, but you can get a demo. AWS Marketplace listing, however, indicates a starting price of $50,000 for a 12-month contract.

Bottom line

Knostic is ideal for enterprises using or planning to deploy LLM-based tools like Copilot and need precise control over sensitive data exposure.

5. Zencoder

Zencoder offers semi-autonomous agents that handle code generation, review, testing, and deployment while maintaining quality standards and security protocols.

Key features

• AI coding agents: Zencoder has configurable agents for code generation, bug fixes, documentation, and test automation, tailored to their specific workflow and coding standards.
• Repo grokking: The platform analyzes your codebase to understand architecture, dependencies, and custom implementations.
• Audit logging and compliance: It includes features for audit trails, role-based access, SSO, and enterprise certifications such as SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
• Multi-language support: It works across 70+ programming languages and integrates with IDEs such as VS Code and JetBrains.

Pros

• Repo grokking lets its agents produce context-aware code that adheres to team practices and standards.
• Zentester agents auto-create and execute unit/e2e tests to maintain high code coverage and reliability.
• You can embed compliance checks directly into development and deployment pipelines by integrating with CI/CD pipelines and version control.

Cons

• Zencoder has Limited pre-built model choices (mainly custom, GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet). User feedback asks for wider LLM support.
• It’s more developer-focused and less friendly to non-technical users.
• Building and refining Zen Agents and pipelines may require ramp-up and technical adjustment time.

Pricing

Zencoder has a free plan for building, testing, and experimenting. It supports 25 premium LLM calls/day and unlimited calls if you have your own API keys. The paid plans start at $19 per user/month for 200 premium LLM calls/day and unlimited calls in slow mode.

Bottom line

Choose Zencoder if you need governance during AI-assisted software development.

6. Collibra

Collibra provides data intelligence with dedicated AI governance capabilities. It helps organizations discover, manage, and secure data assets. 

Key features

• Data lineage & impact analysis: Collibra tracks the complete lifecycle of data from origins, transformations, and dependencies.
• Regulatory compliance automation: It has built-in assessments for the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, and other global standards.
• Collibra AI copilot & search: The natural language search tools and AI-powered recommendations make it quick for business users to find, understand, and leverage trusted data.
• Deep integrations: Collibra connects to the modern data stack, including Snowflake, BigQuery, Azure, and dbt, making it a central governance hub for hybrid and cloud environments.

Pros

• Collibra provides a single source of truth for all data assets.
• It automates policy enforcement, data discovery, validation, and compliance with regulatory frameworks.
• The platform helps build a strong data culture by making data more accessible, transparent, and actionable.

Cons

• Initial configuration is lengthy and challenging. It often requires specialized consultants.
• Both admins and users need significant training to use the Collibra productively.
• Customizing workflows and dashboards requires additional development.

Pricing

Collibra uses custom pricing, but you can request a demo.

Bottom line

Collibra is the right choice for large enterprises that need compliant governance across their entire data and AI ecosystem and have the budget for enterprise-grade implementation.

7. Holistic AI

Holistic AI provides end-to-end AI governance focused on regulatory compliance, risk assessment, and ethical AI deployment. The platform is designed specifically for enterprises in regulated industries that need oversight across their entire AI ecosystem.

Key features

• AI system discovery and inventory: Holistic AI automatically identifies and catalogs AI systems across the organization, including third-party tools.
• Compliance automation: The platform is pre-configured for global regulations, including EU AI Act, NYC Local Law 144, NIST AI RMF, and ISO 42001.
• AI safeguard for LLMs: Holistic AI tests AI models with thousands of prompts for vulnerabilities, privacy issues, and hallucinations. 
• Audit reporting: It can instantly generate audit-grade risk-mapping and assurance reports that are aligned with legal frameworks and mitigation actions.
• Security controls and integrations: It supports multi-tenant environments, granular RBAC, and integrates with Jira, Slack, ServiceNow, and other enterprise tools.

Pros

• Holistic AI automates compliance mapping for global regulations, which helps orgs reduce legal and reputational risk.
• AI inventory allows organizations to visualize their complete risk posture and ensure no shadow AI tools operate without oversight.
• The continuous risk assessment and scoring help teams promptly detect, monitor, and mitigate privacy vulnerabilities and model failures in real time.

Cons

• It requires extensive information gathering and cultural change for successful implementation.
• The platform may be overkill for organizations with simpler AI governance needs.

Pricing

Custom enterprise subscription with no public pricing available.

Bottom line

Holistic AI is the ideal choice for enterprises in regulated industries (financial services, healthcare, government) that need AI governance with strong regulatory compliance and risk management capabilities.

How we tested these tools

Our evaluation included reviewing detailed product documentation, customer case studies, reports, and user reviews on developer forums or sites like G2.

‍

We looked for:

• Governance depth: We assessed each platform's ability to provide explainability, continuous monitoring, or audit trails for AI systems.
• Enterprise readiness: We check for access controls, SSO, integration capabilities with existing enterprise systems, and support for hybrid or on-prem deployments.
• Ease of use: We evaluated how well each governance platform handles oversight of citizen development.

Common challenges in AI code governance

Even with the best tools and intentions, AI governance programs face recurring obstacles that can derail implementation or limit effectiveness. 

‍

The biggest hurdles organizations encounter are:

• Data quality and bias issues: AI systems can perpetuate or amplify existing data problems across the organization if they use poor-quality data.
• Hallucination risks: AI-generated content can appear credible while being factually incorrect. Traditional code review processes don't catch these issues.
• Integration with legacy IT systems: Most governance tools weren't designed to work with existing enterprise architecture. Organizations often need to build custom integrations to achieve full visibility.
• Cost and resource intensity: Many governance tools use enterprise pricing that’s costly for smaller orgs. They may also require significant configuration, training, and ongoing maintenance that strains already limited resources.

Best practices for implementing AI governance in the enterprise

You have to implement AI governance in ways that actually work within your organization's culture and constraints. 

‍

The most effective programs follow the following governance best practices:

• Start small and scale up gradually. Choose one business unit or use case to pilot your governance approach. Learn what works before expanding to other teams and applications.
• Build cross-functional teams that include legal, IT, data science, and business stakeholders. AI governance requires diverse expertise that no single team possesses.
• Embed monitoring and observability directly into development workflows. Governance works best when it doesn't add friction to development processes; otherwise, it slows down innovation.
• Keep governance policies adaptive to accommodate rapid changes in AI technology. Rigid rules become obstacles rather than enablers as AI capabilities evolve.

Which AI code governance tool should you choose?

Choose an AI code governance tool that matches your organization’s (startup vs. enterprise), risk profile (regulated vs. non-regulated industry), and compliance requirements.

‍

Here’s a broad decision criterion:

• Choose Superblocks if you want to empower business users and engineers to build internal tooling together while maintaining security and compliance.
• Pick Endor Labs if you need to catch open source risks and vulnerabilities.
• Select Domo when your AI governance strategy centers on data intelligence.
• Consider Knostic if you need access control for Copilot-style tools.
• Choose Zencoder if you need security controls during AI-assisted development.
• Select Collibra for compliant governance across entire data and AI ecosystems.
• Choose Holistic AI for end-to-end AI lifecycle governance.

My final verdict: Build governed apps securely with Superblocks

Among the tools we’ve discussed, Superblocks is the best AI governance solution for internal tooling. Its support for AI app generation with built-in governance enables rapid AI development without introducing security or compliance gaps. This is a core challenge most orgs face when building and scaling with AI, especially for production use

‍

We’ve looked at the key features that enable this, but just to quickly recap:

• Flexible development modalities: Teams can use Clark to generate apps from prompts, the WYSIWYG drag-and-drop editor, or code. Superblocks syncs the changes you make in code and the visual editor.
• Context-aware AI app generation: Every app built with Clark abides by organizational standards for data security, permissions, and compliance. This addresses the major LLM risks of ungoverned shadow AI app generation.
• Centrally managed governance layer: It supports granular access controls with RBAC, SSO, and audit logs, all centrally governed from a single pane of glass across all users. It also integrates with secret managers for safe credentials management.
• Keep data on prem: It has an on-prem agent you can deploy within your VPC to keep sensitive data in-network.
• Extensive integrations: It can integrate with any API or databases. These integrations include your SDLC processes, like Git workflows and CI/CD pipelines.
• AI app generation guardrails: You can customize prompts and set LLMs to follow your design systems and best practices. This supports secure and governed vibe coding.

Ready for zero-friction governance? Book a demo with one of our product experts.

Frequently asked questions 

What is the difference between AI governance tools and model governance tools?

AI governance tools manage enterprise-wide risk of AI use, while model governance tools manage the technical lifecycle of machine learning models.

What features should I look for in an AI governance platform?

Essential features to look for in an AI governance platform include access controls, audit logging, and integration capabilities with existing systems.

Why do enterprises need an AI governance platform?

Enterprises need AI governance platforms to manage compliance requirements, mitigate security and bias risks, and establish accountability for AI decisions. Without governance, AI projects often fail to move beyond the pilot stage due to compliance and risk concerns.

Which industries benefit most from enterprise AI governance?

Highly regulated industries such as financial services, healthcare, insurance, and government agencies benefit the most due to strict compliance requirements. However, any enterprise using AI at scale needs governance to manage risks.

Are open-source AI governance tools reliable for large enterprises?

Open-source tools are reliable for enterprises with strong technical teams because they typically require customization and ongoing maintenance. Commercial solutions offer enterprise support that’s helpful during implementation.

How much does AI governance software cost?

Enterprise platforms usually have custom pricing, but Knostic, for example, lists $50,000 for 12 months on AWS Marketplace. Zencoder costs $19/month on the starter plan. Costs will often depend on what the tool is offering and your org’s needs.